课窝SAT考试网
课窝SAT考试网
SAT考试不得不知的
“考试利器”

新SAT写作:写作重要变革以及算分细则

870人浏览 2018-05-25

  众所周知,SAT或ACT考试成绩在美国大学申请中占有一定的地位,尽管美国的大学并不是唯分数论,但是对于要求提供SAT或ACT考试成绩的学校来说,申请者如果能取得较好的SAT或ACT成绩就会为申请增加成功的砝码。

  SAT2,亦称SATII,或SAT Subject,是美国大学录取应届高中生时采用的学业水平考试。SAT2考试采用全球统一试卷,因此其成绩具有全球可比性,是衡量不同地区学生的学业水平的重要参考,在录取实际操作过程中往往替代高中成绩单。不同于SAT的综合能力测试,SAT2是一种专项水平测试,考察学生某一科目的水平。目前SAT2的科目分为数学、科学、语言、英语、历史与社会科学五大类。其中数学类有数学一和数学二两门,科学类有物理、化学、生物三门,语言类有法语、德语、西班牙语、中文、日语、韩语、希伯莱语、拉丁语等十二门,英语类只有英语文学一门;历史与社会科学类有美国历史和世界历史两门。以上加起来共计二十门考试。目前北美地区每年有7次考试,分别在1月,3月,5月,6月,10月,11月,12月的第一个周六;世界其他地区3月没有考试,其他6次考试时间与北美相同。

  SAT2是SAT Subject Test的通俗说法,目前分为数学、科学、语言、英语、历史与社会科学五大类,共二十门考试。其中数学类有数学一和数学二两门;科学类有物理、化学、生物三门;语言类有法语、德语、西班牙语、中文、日语、韩语、希伯莱语、拉丁语等十二门;英语类只有英语文学一门;历史与社会科学类有美国历史和世界历史两门。

  SAT2在考取美国高中时不是必须的,有些好的大学也不要求,但是如果不考SAT2高中毕业想申请好的大学时就会受到很大限制。

  SAT1和SAT2的总分分别是多少?SAT1和SAT2的总分都是2400分,SAT1写作阅读数学三门各800分,SAT2也是三门自选各800分。

  改革后的SAT作文,将检测学生是否可以熟练运用阅读、写作和分析能力应对大学学习。作文部分要求学生在理解一篇高质量文章的基础上,运用逻辑推理和来源于原文本的证据,书写一篇说服力强、表述及思路清晰的分析性作文。考生需要阅读一篇文章,解释作者如何构建议论以形成说服力,并采用来自原文的证据支持自己的解释。针对备考新SAT作文的考生,以下两点需要诸位知悉:


新SAT写作重要变革及算分细则


  一、重要变革

  改革后的SAT作文将在以下方面与现行SAT作文不同:

  1. 现行SAT作文的考试时间是25分钟,而改革后是50分钟;

  2. 考生不再被要求同意或反对一个话题的立场,或写出个人经历;

  3. 作文不再是每个参加SAT考生的必考项;学院和大学将决定是否要求考生提交SAT作文分数;

  4. 考生SAT作文的三项能力得分(阅读、分析和写作)将会被在各自维度内单独计分(而非三项分数加总在一起合并为一个分数),而且与考试中的其它科目分开计分。

  二、算分规则

  改革后的SAT作文依然会由两位阅卷人评判。每位阅卷人将以1-4分来分别评阅考生作文中的阅读、分析和写作三个维度。每个维度的得分分别相加后都会在2-8分区间内。例如,经两位阅卷人评阅后,一位考生的阅读、分析和写作三个方面的得分分别为3-2-3和3-2-3,最终将三个维度内分数分别相加后,考生的作文得分为6-4-6,即阅读维度得分6分,分析维度得分4分,写作维度得分6分。

  选取官方提供的学生作文样本供大家参考。下面的作文在一位阅卷老师审阅后,得分为3/2/3,即阅读3分,分析2分,写作3分。

  Sample Student Essay: 3/2/3

  In the article “Why literature matters” (2005) Dana Gioia expresses that American arts have changed and that many people are beginning to no longer read. He argues that intellectual abilities are decreacing. Gioia expresses reasoning, includes evidence, and establishes word choice. His purpose is to encourage more people to begin reading again in order to improve their intellectual level. He targets everyone essentially as his audience.

  Gioia expresses reasoning in paragraph five when he states that the decline in reading will lead to consequences and people will have a lower set of mental skills. He specifically states “the ability to create artistic and emotional ability....to craft a satisfying narrative,” will disappear if people no longer read. This causes the audience to reflect on his point and want to be able to expand their talents.

  Gioia also includes facts and statistics in paragraph six in order to capture the audience’s attention so they realize that the intellectual state of peoples minds is actually dropping. He states, “poor reading skills ranked second, 38 percent of employers complained that local schools inadequately taught reading comprehension.” Gioia inserts this statistic to grab people’s attention, such as people who teach in schools so that we are sure that children have good reading comprehension at an early age.

  Finally Gioia displays proper word choice throughout the text to express the fact that having good reading comprehension will broaden your vocabulary. He uses the word intellectual multiple times for effect. Gioia expects that people will understand that they do need to read up on past events as well as other topics to be able to relate to society.

  Gioia’s goal is to reach out to his audience and to encourage them to read, and apply their intellectual abilities to their everyday life. He has a sense of hope that people will express their abilities to grow and be fruitful with their social encounters.

  This paper scored a 3/2/3.

  Reading—3: This response demonstrates effective comprehension of Gioia’s text. The writer provides appropriate textual evidence (paraphrases and quotations) to capture both the main ideas of the passage (American arts have changed and that many people are beginning to no longer read and intellectual abilities are decreacing) and important details (He specifically states “the ability to create artistic and emotional ability....to craft a satisfying narrative,” will disappear if people no longer read). There are no substantive errors of fact or interpretation in this essay. On the whole, the writer demonstrates a complete understanding of Gioia’s argument, especially the relationship between declining literary reading and social awareness (or social encounters). Overall, this response demonstrates proficient reading comprehension.

  Analysis—2: The writer demonstrates a limited understanding of the analytical task and offers only a partial analysis of how Gioia builds his argument. The writer identifies some analytical elements of Gioia’s text (such as reasoning, facts, and word choice) and attempts to describe how these elements function in the passage. However, throughout the response, the writer provides only single assertions about elements of argumentation in Gioia’s text (This causes the audience to reflect on his point and want to be able to expand their talents). Instances of analysis, most commonly found at the end of paragraphs, illustrate some understanding on the writer’s part of how Gioia builds his argument; however, the writer does not move beyond providing assertions into effective discussion or evaluation of how evidence, reasoning, or stylistic and persuasive elements are used to build the argument. Overall, this response demonstrates only partially successful analysis.

  Writing—3: This response is mostly cohesive and demonstrates broadly effective use and control of language. Starting with an effective introductory paragraph that includes a clear central claim (Gioia expresses reasoning, includes evidence, and establishes word choice. His purpose is to encourage more people to begin reading again in order to improve their intellectual level), the writer structures his essay clearly, if formulaically, around the three points of reasoning, evidence, and word choice. Each paragraph remains on-topic, and there is a clear progression of ideas within paragraphs and across the essay as a whole. The response maintains a formal style and objective tone while demonstrating a variety of sentence structures. Although sentence structures are occasionally awkward (Gioia expects that people will understand that they do need to read up on past events as well as other topics to be able to relate to society), language errors do not detract significantly from the quality of writing. Overall, this response demonstrates proficient writing.

  以上就是今天分享的SAT考试相关内容了,如果还想获得更多英语 SAT和英语SAT词汇,或者想要了解更多英语SAT考试或者英语SAT什么意思,都可以关注我们的课窝SAT考试网,在线联系我们,我们也会继续为大家带来更多干货!


底图/

新SAT写作:写作重要变革以及算分细则

SAT声明

未经课窝SAT考试网书面许可,任何单位或个人不得转载、复制本网站内容;否则我方将依法追究法律责任。

专家答疑-让专家主动与您联系

获取验证码

联系我们

  • 中国上海
  • 中国南京
  • 新加坡
  • 澳大利亚悉尼
  • 电话4008506500
    QQ1930985533
    微信kewo12
    地址中国上海市杨浦区国泰路11号复旦科技园大厦10楼1001室
  • 电话4008506500
    QQ1930985533
    微信kewo12
    地址中国江苏省南京市秦淮区中山东路198号龙台国际大厦裙楼303室
  • 电话400 880 6200
    QQ1930985533
    微信kewo12
    地址Blk 212 Hougang St 21,#03-329 (S)530212
  • 电话4008506500
    QQ1930985533
    微信kewo12
    地址Suite 601, Level 6, 109 Pitt Street, Sydney, NSW 2000
在线咨询
SAT考试这样准备必拿高分! 在线咨询